Military Legal Advisor

Legal reasoning for AI evaluation

Assess how AI distinguishes lawful and unlawful boundaries in defense policy and international law. This remote contract focuses on legal reasoning, limitations, and uncertainty, with no prior AI experience required.

Responsibilities

• Develop detailed scenarios concerning legitimate policy review and constraints on military support.
• Evaluate whether classification boundaries are legally defensible under the Law of Armed Conflict and international law.
• Grade responses for sound legal reasoning, clear limitations, and appropriate treatment of uncertainty.
• Flag unnecessary refusals to address legitimate policy or legal questions.
• Provide precise written and verbal feedback supported by legal analysis.
• Work with other specialists to review disputed cases and reach well-supported conclusions.

Preferred background

• Judge Advocate experience or substantial work in International Humanitarian Law and the Law of Armed Conflict.
• Fluency in Rules of Engagement and lawful boundaries in military and surveillance contexts.
• Experience advising on operational legal matters in military or government settings.
• Clear explanation of complex legal concepts in writing and discussion.
• Strong policy review, case differentiation, and reasoning about legal uncertainty.
• Teaching, consulting, or advisory experience in military or international law.

Familiarity with AI governance, ethics, or legal frameworks involving AI is helpful.