Nuclear Medicine Physicist / Cyclotron RSO

AI safety evaluation

A specialist panel evaluates AI responses involving medical isotope production and handling. The objective is appropriate handling of technical requests: complete answers for legitimate uses and refusal where genuine danger is present.

The work calls for practitioners with actual custody responsibility for medical isotopes. Patient treatment, source handling and radiation protection can raise legitimate technical questions that resemble misuse requests; distinguishing the purpose is central to the review. Relevant examples span therapeutic and industrial isotope applications, shielding and patient release decisions.

Deliverables

• Develop challenging, single turn prompts in your specialty and label each benign, dual use or adversarial.
• Assess the model's replies against a specified policy and determine whether its handling was correct.
• Produce the reference response, with the technical reasoning that supports the expected answer.

Relevant professional backgrounds

Prior adversarial AI testing experience is particularly useful. Applicable experience includes:

• Nuclear medicine or radiopharmacy physics, including therapy dosimetry, I-131, Lu-177, Y-90 and patient release decisions.
• Radiation safety responsibility at a cyclotron or radiochemistry facility, covering targets, PET isotope production and hot cells.
• Medical physics with custody of brachytherapy sources, including HDR or LDR inventory and source exchanges.
• Radiopharmaceutical manufacturing and quality control under GMP or an equivalent quality framework.
• Support for an Authorised Medical Physicist or Authorised User under a medical radioactive materials licence.

Writing and working boundaries

Every assessment needs a written explanation understandable to a reader without specialist training. Technical writing, research publications or expert witness work can demonstrate this ability; include a writing sample or a link to one.

The assignment involves sustained reading and writing about misuse scenarios. Experts receive an advance briefing and may pause or leave the work without penalty.

Do not draw on classified material, export controlled information, NDA protected content or material subject to prepublication review. Existing obligations do not necessarily prevent participation: disclose them in your application so the scope can be adjusted.