Health Physicist

AI safety evaluation

Contribute practical health physics expertise to an AI safety testing panel. The aim is to assess whether models answer legitimate technical questions accurately while recognizing and declining requests that could enable harm.

The work requires professional judgment about context and intent. Both unjustified refusals of routine professional questions and responses that provide inappropriate assistance count as failures.

Responsibilities

• Write challenging single-turn prompts labeled as benign, dual-use or adversarial.

• Evaluate model responses against the defined policy standard and record whether each was handled correctly.

• Write a reference answer showing the appropriate response and the technical rationale supporting it.

Relevant professional background

The role calls for people who have done the measurement and the dose planning themselves, in a facility where getting it wrong mattered — survey, assay, contamination control, work planning. Professional judgment must distinguish legitimate requests from potential misuse: the same shielding calculation protects a worker and conceals a source.

Create prompts that test that distinction and assess whether the response respects it. Relevant backgrounds include the following; prior AI safety testing is helpful:

• Operational health physicist at a DOE site, national laboratory or reactor facility — survey, assay, contamination control

• Internal dosimetry or bioassay specialist — intake assessment, dose reconstruction, committed dose

• Decommissioning and D&D health physicist — characterisation surveys, MARSSIM, release criteria

• Accelerator or reactor health physics — activation products, neutron fields, shielding design and verification

• Dose planning for high-hazard work — RWP development, ALARA reviews, hot-cell and glovebox operations

Writing and working conditions

Every evaluation needs a clear written rationale that a non-specialist can understand. Technical writing, published research or expert witness experience is valuable; a writing sample can demonstrate that background.

Assignments involve sustained reading and writing about misuse scenarios. Experts receive a briefing in advance and may pause or step away without penalty.

Work must exclude classified or export-controlled information and material restricted by an NDA or prepublication review obligation. Existing obligations should be disclosed so assignments can be scoped appropriately.